Which covering is right for your model project?
by Louis Joyner ([email protected])
As seen in "Free Flight Duration" in the May 2009 issue of Model Aviation
When I started in Free Flight, there were only a few covering-material choices. Japanese tissue offered light weight and a wide range of colors, but it was easy to puncture.
Silkspan, available in several weights, was stronger than tissue and had enough wet strength to allow wet covering. But the color choices were limited, and it required more dope to fill the pores. Silk was great for wet covering but was expensive and took a lot of dope to fill.
Image

Bud Romak covered his original Moffett with yellow Japanese tissue accented with dark-blue tissue. Yellow artist’s ink added to clear dope provides a brighter, fade-resistant finish.
Wet covering used to be the best way to deal with curved surfaces, elliptical wingtips, or built-up fuselages. The process involved wetting the silkspan or silk with water, blotting off the surface water, and then draping and pulling it over the model structure. Dope was brushed through the covering material, to adhere it to the balsa. Pros could cover a polyhedral wing, top and bottom, with one piece of silk. Now, a half century later, we have almost too many choices. Tissue, silkspan, and silk can still be found. In addition, a wide variety of plastic films offer resistance to moisture and high-nitromethane fuels, as well as faster covering. Which covering material is best? The answer is, “it depends.” For lightweight Rubber designs, Japanese tissue is still a good choice. In addition to the wide range of colors, it provides a fair amount of torsional strength when tight. This can be important for models with simple wing structures that aren’t inherently strong. Most wings with straight ribs and a single spar fit this category. Tight tissue covering will dramatically increase the stiffness of such a wing. However, a damp morning or a light rain will cause the tissue to loosen and sag, with an almost total loss of strength. Extra coats of clear dope help seal out the moisture. For additional protection in the rain, spray on a coat of 3M Scotch Guard. This fabric protector will cause the raindrops to bead, making them easier to wipe off with a paper towel. Another problem with tissue is fading. Keeping the model out of the sun as much as possible will help, but the best solution for long-term protection is to add color to the clear dope used to coat the tissue. One of the most popular techniques is to use Higgins fade-proof ink, which is available at most art-supply stores. The suggested mix is one part ink, 9-10 parts thinner, and one part clear dope. Spraying will give a more even finish than brushing. The Higgins method works best if you use the same color ink as tissue (such as a yellow ink mixture over yellow tissue). On his Moffett design, Bud Romak added wide strips of dark-blue tissue to a mostly yellow model. To save weight, the blue strips were not applied over yellow tissue; instead, Bud covered the model with yellow, omitting tissue where he wanted blue strips. Then he covered those wing bays with blue tissue. He sprayed the entire wing with the yellow ink-dope mixture, which had only a slight effect on the color of the dark-blue tissue. But little can be done to increase the tissue’s resistance to punctures, except to fly over the proverbial tall grass. The plastic covering material that is closest to traditional tissue and silkspan is Polyspan. Available only in white, this material resembles silkspan.Image

Bob Mattes used Polyspan to cover his scaled-up Amazoom’s wing and stabilizer. Red paint on the rudder, forward fuselage, and underside of tips aid in visibility. Power is a Fox .35 he’s had since he was 16.
Image

Paul Crowley’s Moffett Rubber model is covered with a few materials. Wing inner panels are covered with metalized Mylar. Tips and stabilizer are covered with red-dyed clear Mylar. The fuselage is covered with Polyspan and sprayed with clear dope that has red dye added.
Polyspan is applied with dope, as is tissue, and then tightened with an iron, as are plastic film coverings. Then several coats of clear dope or lacquer are applied to seal the pores. It’s important to make sure that the smooth side of the covering is on the outside and that the covering runs spanwise as it comes off the roll. The finished weight for Polyspan is nearly 3.6 grams per square foot—approximately double the weight of doped tissue. However, Polyspan is much tougher than tissue. Stubble that would puncture tissue usually leaves only a slight depression in Polyspan, and those are easy to remove with the tip of a hot iron. Many Rubber fliers use Polyspan to over built-up fuselages for extra strength and less tendency to absorb rubber lube. For coloring Polyspan, you can use the same ink-dope technique I mentioned or one of the special dyes available from FAI Model Supply. Another approach is to leave most of the wing white but add areas of bright color to the tips, to increase visibility. Design Master florist’s spray, available at most craft stores, is available in bright colors as well as a surprisingly opaque black. As in the old days of tissue or silkspan, you should dope Polyspan with butyrate dope when used on a fuel-burning model. There are also other synthetic tissues, such as Lite Span and Air Span. Where weight is critical, 1/4 mil Mylar is almost as light as you can go. Available in both clear and metalized versions, this plastic film is not precoated with adhesive. Instead, the framework of the wing or tail must first be coated with a heat-sensitive adhesive, such as Balsaloc. After that’s dry, the Mylar is attached using a trim iron and heat-shrunk. Also available are 1/2 mil and 1 mil thicknesses that give a bit more strength. Although these thin Mylar coverings work well in the rain, they are prone to tears or punctures. The thin Mylar provides little torsional strength. The clear Mylar can be colored with fabric dye before covering. An interesting approach is to combine Mylar and tissue. To do this, cover the model with clear Mylar and then give it a coat of clear dope. Then smooth tissue over the Mylar. Thinner applied with a brush activates the dried dope, attaching it to the Mylar. A final coat or two of clear further seals the tissue. For larger models, the heavier, adhesive-backed plastic coverings provide extra strength and resistance to fuels. That’s why many Power fliers have gone to coverings such as Hangar 9 UltraCote. “It’s like MonoKote, just better,” says Ronnie Thompson. “Film is the only way to go.” On his larger AMA Gas models, Ronnie uses transparent UltraCote for the flying surfaces. But he also uses a traditional covering material. The balsa D-box on his Sunbird series of models is covered with silkspan, and then the entire wing is covered with UltraCote. “The silkspan really adds to the strength,” he says.Image

For Power models, heavier coverings such as UltraCote offer strength and resistance to high-nitro fuels. An O.S. Max .25 ducted-fan engine powers Ronnie Thompson’s 528-square-inch Sunbird.
Image

Comments
Solartex
What happened to Solartex. It worked great for our purposes and was easy to apply. Where did it go? Is there a similar replacement and if so, what is it? I don't want "tissue and dope". Neither do we like the look of Ultracoat or Monocoat. What can we use
Monokote is Far Better than Ultracote
This is a one sided paid commercial for Ultracote. Monokote is far superior in many ways. Ultracote has a terrible tendency to "walk" or slide when shrinking. It is often impossible to get a drum tight finish. Monokote however when sealed down at an edge, can be shrunk without any sliding. When it it down, it is down. I have heard from some first time modelers that they like the fact that Ultracote can be pulled up and replaced so is easier to work with. I am a professional modeler and I want it to stick. If it peals up in the shop, it will peal up at the field. Ultracote can't take heat and will burn a hole through. Monokote can take lots of heat and retains shrinking qualities long after the original covering. Monokote is also much longer lasting and tougher. The fight between the two coverings have been going on for years, but I have used both extensively over the past 30 years and will never use Ultracote again unless I am repairing someone's plane already coated with it. My planes covered in Monokote will look like new in ten years. My friend's arfs covered in Ultracote look worn after only a few months of flying. Monokote wins hands down.
Monokote vs Ultracoat
I have used both materials and have found the same problems with Ultracoat. I have a model (SUPERCAKE - M.A.N) that I built over 25 years ago and it still looks like new.
I have used Ulteacoat OVER Monokote for adding trim and graphics. For this Ultracoat works well with no bubbles.
Monokote is still the number one covering material.
Replacement mylar type covering for my damaged FLUTTER-BY
I bought my Flutter-By many years ago from the manufacturer in Indiana. After some mishaps, I need to replace the covering on my tail surfaces. The material is super thin, colored orange, and appears to have reinforcing threads cross ways at intervals of about 1/4". What is this and where can I buy it?
Covering
I like this stuff from Ali Express:
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/2251801705564852.html?spm=a2g0o.detail.p…
It seems excellent: lighter than Ultra or Mono, strong, not wimpy, very good stiffness, adheres well, shrinks well,
Add new comment